Friends are like the substitute of our familyespecially when we are distant to our family. Look for allies is even harder rather than look for foes.
He says that we simply don't know what women are capable of, because we have never let them try — one cannot make an authoritative statement without evidence.
We can't stop women from trying things because they might not be able to do them. An argument based on speculative physiology is just that, speculation.
What women by nature cannot do, it is quite superfluous to forbid them from doing. Here Mill suggests that men are basically admitting that women are capable of doing the activity, but that men do not want them to do so.
Whether women can do them or not must be found out in practice. In reality, we don't know what women's nature is, because it is so wrapped up in how they have been raised.
Mill suggests we should test out what women can and can't do — experiment. Until conditions of equality exist, no one can possibly assess the natural differences between women and men, distorted as they have been. What is natural to the two sexes can only be found out by allowing both to develop and use their faculties freely.
If we tried equality, we would see that there were benefits for individual women. They would be free of the unhappiness of being told what to do by men.
And there would be benefits for society at large — it would double the mass of mental faculties available for the higher service of humanity. The ideas and potential of half the population would be liberated, producing a great effect on human development.
Mill's essay is clearly utilitarian in nature on three counts: The immediate greater good,  the enrichment of society,  and individual development. If society really wanted to discover what is truly natural in gender relations, Mill argued, it should establish a free market for all of the services women perform, ensuring a fair economic return for their contributions to the general welfare.
Only then would their practical choices be likely to reflect their genuine interests and abilities.
Mill felt that the emancipation and education of women would have positive benefits for men also. The stimulus of female competition and companionship of equally educated persons would result in the greater intellectual development of all.
He stressed the insidious effects of the constant companionship of an uneducated wife or husband. Mill felt that men and women married to follow customs and that the relation between them was a purely domestic one.
By emancipating women, Mill believed, they would be better able to connect on an intellectual level with their husbands, thereby improving relationships. Mill attacks marriage laws, which he likens to the slavery of women, "there remain no legal slaves, save the mistress of every house.
He also argues for the need for reforms of marriage legislation whereby it is reduced to a business agreement, placing no restrictions on either party. Among these proposals are the changing of inheritance laws to allow women to keep their own property, and allowing women to work outside the home, gaining independent financial stability.
Again the issue of women's suffrage is raised. Women make up half of the population, thus they also have a right to a vote since political policies affect women too. He theorises that most men will vote for those MPs who will subordinate women, therefore women must be allowed to vote to protect their own interests.
If given the chance women would excel in other arenas and they should be given the opportunity to try.
Mill was not just a theorist; he actively campaigned for women's rights as an MP and was the president of the National Society for Women's Suffrage. Conclusions[ edit ] The way Mill interpreted subjects over time changed.Friends will introduce you to people you might have otherwise not have met.
When you have friends that love socializing and meeting new people, you get the opportunity to expand your social circle. In most cases they are always eager to introduce you to someone they met . Civil Rights Argumentative Essay About Same Sex Marriage. This Argumentative essay will discuss the argument of same sex marriage.
The contents are: meaning, brief background and thesis statement for the Introduction; for the Body of the discussion is the counter argument; and for the conclusion part: the summary and the restatement of the thesis statement.
write an essay on my role model kohli flood essay words drugs years essay birthday party 1 page essay about yourself slideshow essay on bhagat singh in words in hindi books 2 page essay question paper 8th class hindi lesson plan 14th amendment essay us constitution due process clause youtube how to write a paper in dialogue form how to write an essay lesson plan resume college.
What Is the Meaning of True Friendship? - Friendship. What is the meaning of a true friendship. Who is that one true friend or friends. Whether it is a person’s pet, spouse, or sisters, friendship is that special bond between two or more individuals that share a mutual affection.
Friendship A friend is defined as a person whom one knows, likes, and trusts, therefore this is a friendship. In every society in the world people have and follow this relationship and support it. In some societies this relationship is given more importance than others.
In a study cited in the “Wall Street Journal” article, “Beyond Facebook: the Benefits of Deeper Friendships,” writer Sue Shellenbarger examined the health benefits associated with friendship. Having friends reduces bodily stress, which leads to reduced blood pressure, a .