First use[ edit ] Evidence of the use of interchangeable parts can be traced back over two thousand years to Carthage in the First Punic War. Carthaginian ships had standardized, interchangeable parts that even came with assembly instructions akin to "tab a into slot b" marked on them. Its focus at the time was artillery more than muskets or handguns. One of the accomplishments of the system was that solid cast cannons were bored to precise tolerances, which allowed the walls to be thinner than cannons poured with hollow cores.
First use[ edit ] Evidence of the use of interchangeable parts can Interchangeable parts traced back over two thousand years to Carthage in the First Punic War. Carthaginian ships had standardized, interchangeable parts that even came with assembly instructions akin to "tab a into slot b" marked on them.
Its focus at the time was artillery more than muskets or handguns. One of the accomplishments of the system was that solid cast cannons were bored to precise tolerances, which allowed the walls to be thinner than cannons poured with hollow cores.
However, because cores were often Interchangeable parts center, the wall thickness determined the size of the bore. Standardized boring allowed cannons to be shorter without sacrificing accuracy and range because of the tighter fit of the shells.
It also allowed standardization of the shells. If one single component of a firearm needed a replacement, the entire firearm either had to be sent to an expert gunsmith for custom repairs, or discarded and replaced by another firearm. During the 18th and early 19th centuries, the idea of replacing these methods with a system of interchangeable manufacture was gradually developed.
Blanc demonstrated in front of a committee of scientists that his muskets could be fitted with flint locks picked at random from a pile of parts.
Jefferson tried to persuade Blanc to move to America, but was not successful, so he wrote to the American Secretary of War with the idea, and when he returned to the USA he worked to fund its development.
President George Washington approved of the idea, and by a contract was issued to Eli Whitney for 12, muskets built under the new system.
The development of the machine tools and manufacturing practices required would be a great expense to the U. Ordnance Departmentand for some years while trying to achieve interchangeabililty, the firearms produced cost more to manufacture.
Bythere was evidence that interchangeable parts, then perfected by the Federal Armories, led to savings. The Ordnance Department freely shared the techniques used with outside suppliers. In July he built ten guns, all containing the same exact parts and mechanisms, then disassembled them before the United States Congress.
He placed the parts in a mixed pile and, with help, reassembled all of the firearms right in front of Congress, much like Blanc had done some years before. The use of interchangeable parts removed the problems of earlier eras concerning the difficulty or impossibility of producing new parts for old equipment.
If one firearm part failed, another could be ordered, and the firearm would not have to be discarded. Charles Fitch credited Whitney with successfully executing a firearms contract with interchangeable parts using the American System but historians Merritt Roe Smith and Robert B.
Gordon have since determined that Whitney never actually achieved interchangeable parts manufacturing. At the time, the Napoleonic War was at its height, and the Royal Navy was in a state of expansion that requiredpulley blocks to be manufactured a year.
Bentham had already achieved remarkable efficiency at the docks by introducing power-driven machinery and reorganising the dockyard system.
Marc Brunel, a pioneering engineer, and Maudslay, a founding father of machine tool technology who had developed the first industrially practical screw-cutting lathe in which standardized screw thread sizes for the first time,  collaborated on plans to manufacture block-making machinery; the proposal was submitted to the Admiralty who agreed to commission his services.
Bythe dockyard had been fully updated with the revolutionary, purpose-built machinery at a time when products were still built individually with different components.
A total of 45 machines were required to perform 22 processes on the blocks, which could be made in three different sizes. The machines were almost entirely made of metal thus improving their accuracy and durability.
The machines would make markings and indentations on the blocks to ensure alignment throughout the process.The concept of interchangeable parts was used by Christopher Polhem in the manufacture of clock gears in Sweden at the beginning of the s. The gears were made by machines with precision measurement to insure interchangeability; however, this work was probably not known in America.
Interchangeable Parts A manual for the interchangeable parts of a rifle. Before the Industrial Revolution, there was no standardization for producing machine parts. In this lesson, we will look at the role Eli Whitney played in promoting the use of interchangeable parts.
We will explore the concept of. Two Stuffed Animals with Interchangeable Parts. Panda measures /2" H 3 In 1 Hair Curlers Care Styling Curling Wand Interchangeable 3 Parts Clip Hair Iron Curler Set Curler Hair Styles Tool BLACK US PLUG.
by Hair Curler. $ $ 32 Interchangeable parts: Interchangeable parts, identical components that can be substituted one for another, particularly important in the history of manufacturing. Mass production, which transformed the organization of work, came about by the development of the .
Brief history of interchangeable parts, starting with the Arsenal of Venice, but focusing on its main achievements with Honoré Blanc in France, and John Hall and Simeon North in America.
Shows the ups and downs of these inventors and their achievements.